|
CLE Leadership & Management By Chuck Bingaman - chuck@chuckbingaman.com #5 April, 2003 We’re living in complex,
disturbing, sometimes depressing times. It’s difficult to keep our
thoughts—even during working hours—on CLE and how to manage it as well as we
can. I wish I had a brilliant, inspirational
message to make the world situation seem less daunting. As addictive as they are, I do think
we all need to take breaks from the news media, perhaps for some lengthy period
every day and perhaps for a day or two each week. And maybe we need to get away from the
office and have a real coffee break with an old friend once or twice each
week. I’m doing that, and I’m finding
it refreshing, fun and therapeutic! Leadership
Very
simply
stated, a governing board’s roles are to set and keep current the major policy
directions of the organization and to recruit, employ and evaluate the head of
staff. Beyond those roles, which
are quite substantive and vital to the organization, the entry of board members
into day-to-day operations of a CLE entity invites confusion, tension and
disruption. The staff leader’s roles
are to manage the enterprise consistently with the board’s policy decisions,
to recognize and raise policy issues for board guidance and to report on the
execution of the board’s policy decisions. If the staff intrudes into the policy-making
role, it invites either conflict with the board or diminishing interest on the
part of the board. In healthy organizations,
both the board and the staff play their roles fully and well and respect the
other’s vital domain. Unfortunately, in some cases, the parties
do not understand the differing natures of their roles, don’t communicate clearly
where the roles may overlap, blunder into each other’s domains and create unnecessary
conflict and business problems. I
suggest two
approaches to minimizing board/staff confusion and conflict. First, make thorough orientation of new
board members—at least a day on-site with the key staff—an integral part of joining
your board. Required participation
in such orientation should be a policy decision endorsed by the board to see
that new members understand the business thoroughly and get up to speed with
the information they need to make future policy decisions. Second, ask the board, as a matter of
policy, to adopt a board member’s job description that clearly sets out its expectations
for and limits on directors’ actions. Part of the new member board orientation
is the review of the board member’s job description. I attach below a draft job description
that can be tailored for most CLE entities. We as professional staff leaders in CLE—the people who provide much of the continuity for our organizations—must provide a significant part the leadership in assuring that the differing roles in CLE governance are honored and kept in balance. Of course our board officers must also understand and help maintain the proper balance of roles. That balance requires periodic discussion, maintenance and flexibility. If we do not provide that education and maintenance, the balance can easily fall into dangerous disequilibrium. Management
The authors note
that, “in an era of global overcapacity, product-centered strategies alone—even
those executed by the most nimble companies—won’t create the kind of growth” that
we seek. That analysis rings true
to CLE as I observe it in many places. There IS overcapacity in CLE, and I do
not see product-centered strategies producing significant growth. The good news is that Slywotzky and Wise
have found companies that have created new ways to grow “by addressing the issues
surrounding their products rather than by simply improving the products
themselves.” Such companies
have exploited a seldom-noted truth that, while the product sale may be the culmination
of the supplier’s efforts, it usually marks the beginning of
the customer’s efforts. The authors
argue that there may be some real products or services that sellers may provide
to ease or make our customers’ efforts more effective. To bring it home to CLE, however effective our CLE courses or print materials may be, lawyers still must translate or apply what they learn from them to their practices. Perhaps we can maintain and grow our CLE organizations by providing new services to build upon those wants and needs to apply what we teach. Nowhere is it written that we are limited to providing traditional courses and publications. I’m just now digesting the insights in the article. And I wonder if we can find ways to grow CLE businesses by expanding into “follow-on” areas. What about providing professionally prepared notes from our courses? What about versions of courses for legal secretaries and paralegals? What about special teaching materials to enable course registrants to teach our subjects to colleagues or to clients when they return to their firms? What about offering MCLE record keeping with built-in reminders of available courses in subjects in which lawyers have indicated past interest? I’d be interested in YOUR take on this growth idea and ideas you suggest for pursuing it. (Note that the authors remind us that the pursuit of issues surrounding our products cannot be allowed to diminish focus on maintaining excellence in our core businesses as they create the opportunities for the other pursuits.) Resources
& Strategies Following an award-winning 20 years as Executive Director of Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, Chuck now consults full-time on business opportunities and management challenges with CLE organizations, legal publishers, and law firms. Chuck also teaches a course on law practice marketing and writes a monthly marketing column for lawyers. You can contact him at chuck@chuckbingaman.com, at 603-756-9268, or at P.O. Box 390, Walpole, NH 03068 where, incidentally, he is a member of the Walpole Society of Pursuers of Horse Thieves and Pilferers of Hen Roosts and Clothelines.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||